facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
In ERISA Retirement Plans, Spouse Beneficiaries Rule Thumbnail

In ERISA Retirement Plans, Spouse Beneficiaries Rule

The beneficiary designation form – and not the retirement account owner’s will or other estate planning documents – usually dictates who will receive the owner’s IRA or 401(k) account after death.

But, as a recent case shows, for ERISA plans, there is one rule that trumps the beneficiary designation form: The spousal beneficiary rule. That rule says that a married ERISA plan participant’s 401(k) balance must automatically be paid to his surviving spouse after death – unless the participant names another beneficiary and the spouse consents to the non-spouse beneficiary.

In ERISA Retirement Plans, Spouse Beneficiaries Rule

LeBoeuf vs. Entergy, No. 24-30583 (5th Cir. 2025)

Alvin Martinez started working for Entergy Corporation in 1967 and participated in the company’s ERISA 401(k) plan. In 2002, Martinez’s wife died. In 2010, he named their four children as beneficiaries on his 401(k) plan beneficiary designation form. The form clearly spelled out the ERISA spousal beneficiary rule. It also warned participants to update the form and get spousal consent if they get married after submitting it. The form noted that a later marriage automatically revokes a prior beneficiary designation without spousal consent. There was similar language in the official plan document and written plan summaries that Martinez received.

Martinez retired in 2003 and kept his 401(k) funds in the plan. In 2014, he married Kathleen Mire. Martinez received quarterly statements from T. Rowe Price, the plan’s trustee, that told him how his plan investments were doing. Even after his second marriage, these statements listed the four children as his beneficiaries and did not mention the ERISA spousal beneficiary rule.

Martinez died in 2021, with a whopping $3.0 million in his 401(k) account. Martinez never updated his beneficiary designation form, and Mire (the second wife) never signed a waiver of her spousal rights. So, as required by ERISA, the plan paid the $3.0 million to Mire.

Naturally, the children sued, and the case was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

The Court of Appeals said that the plan had acted properly. The children argued that Entergy Corporation, the plan’s administrative committee, and T. Rowe Price were all plan fiduciaries under ERISA, and they breached their fiduciary duty by issuing those quarterly statements to Martinez (which listed the children as beneficiaries but did not mention the spousal beneficiary rule). But the Court found that Entergy and T. Rowe Price were not ERISA fiduciaries. Even though the committee was a fiduciary, it hadn’t breached its duty.

We don’t know whether Martinez intended for his four children or his second wife to receive the $3.0 million. But, in either case, this case shows how important it is to periodically review and, if necessary, update beneficiary designation forms. That’s especially true after life events like a second marriage. Yet, if a spouse refuses to consent to another person being named as beneficiary, there’s nothing that can be done to prevent the spouse from receiving the money after the 401(k) owner dies.

By Ian Berger, JD
IRA Analyst
Ed Slott and Company, LLC

Interested in reading more of our library of articles on topics like this and more? Click here to browse our selection of financial articles.

If you plan to have a spousal beneficiary in your retirement plan, click here to schedule a complimentary 20-minute Q&A with a licensed financial advisor who can help you start on the right path.

Christian Cordoba, founder of California Retirement Advisors, has been a member of Ed Slott's Master Elite IRA Advisor Group since 2007.

Copyright © 2025, Ed Slott and Company, LLC Reprinted from The Slott Report, 08/18/25, with permission. https://irahelp.com/in-erisa-retirement-plans-spouse-beneficiaries-rule/, Ed Slott and Company, LLC takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this article. 
Investment advisory services offered through Mutual Advisors, LLC DBA California Retirement Advisors, a SEC registered investment advisor. Securities offered through Mutual Securities, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Mutual Securities, Inc. and Mutual Advisors, LLC are affiliated companies. CA Insurance license #0B09076. This content is developed from sources believed to be providing accurate information and provided by California Retirement Advisors. It may not be used for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. California Retirement Advisors, nor any of its members, are tax accountants or legal attorneys and do not provide tax or legal advice. For tax or legal advice, you should consult your tax or legal professional.
The information being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you click on any of the links provided here, you are leaving this website and viewing information provided by a third party. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided by any third-party website. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences arising out of your access to, or your use of third-party technologies, websites, information and programs made available through this website. By accessing these calculators, you assume total responsibility and risk for your use of the third-party website.